Before I begin, let me preface by saying that I have been with my wife for 20 years, we got together at 16 and were married at 19, but we grew up in an immoral public school environment in a deteriorating rural American culture. We have had 9 children together and most of them are daughters, and so even if I wasn't thrust back into ministry work by God after years of homesteading alone in quiet isolation, I myself would have a vested interested in this subject. Naturally, my exposure to modern world of the sexes is nothing less than disturbing, it was bad in the early 2000s, but it’s REALLY bad now and I have no illusions about that. However, I have an obligation to the people of God to say what I must. I am raising my daughters so that none of what I am addressing will ever be true for them and pray God will bless my endeavor to raise them pure and obedient for their own husbands. May God have mercy on all of us in this.

Introduction.

There is much talk about the political and ideological "gender-gap" wherein there has been a major divergence between the sexes in terms of Right and Left as men have continued to become increasingly conservative and even radically so, a reality that has been the inverse regarding the softer sex; wherein, women have increasingly gravitated towards the radical left and Marxist ideology. This of course parallels the rise in sexlessness, loneliness, declining marriage and birth rates, men pulling out of the workforce and crumbling civilizational infrastructure all while women break records in terms of employment, education, wealth, and the number of previous sexual partners, but not happiness (this last point being the one thing that men and women actually have in common).

Now, this subject has been debated in the red-pill manosphere ad nausem and so I don't desire to rehash this subject from that perspective as my concern is pastoral and ministerial in terms of Christian community. It is going to be easy for Christian ministers to, in the desire to sound fair-minded and avoid the caricature of the "sexist and misogynist" trad-Christian, to share the blame and give equal time to critique both the men and women in the church and come out looking "nuanced, balanced, thoughtful, etc." Fortunately, I don't give a shit about that at all.

I am instead going to call it like I see it as someone working in ministry, churches, and in developing Christian communities internationally, and what I see is that we, as Christians, have a woman-problem far more than we have a "man-problem."

Notice that I said "more" not "only," for of course our men are screwed up too, everyone is screwed up, as if our fallen nature in a fallen world didn't pose enough challenges, even for Christians with the Holy Spirit, we have the additional challenge of our culture and our being raised in it has done irreparable damage to us, all of us, men and women alike.

For men, the sins have manifested in cynicism, hatred, despair, depression, lust, addiction, laziness and apathy. Men have found that there is nothing being offered them in terms of a bright and glorious future, thus, they have despaired of ever having pure wives or any wives in most cases, and in response to this, they have lost all drive in terms of trying to achieve anything even remotely meaningful. Seeing how the culture has destroyed them and their future (a future all men secretly desire), men have become black-pilled, and they have given up and lost all drive. They are pulling out of school, work, and relationships and become depressed, lazy, addicted, and unhealthy, and the civilization that has always depended on their labor, is crumbling as a consequence as the only ones left who are still working to maintain it are actively entering into retirement. Perhaps most concerning of all, is that many of these men are turning to hatred; though they are right that the neo-liberal globalist order failed them in every way, by going down the rabbit-hole to identify root-causes they have stumbled upon the (real) nefarious and malevolent forces that created the world they lived in, of which they were blissfully ignorant during their days of playing call of duty after school. In response to these things (that traditional Christians had been warning about for 50-100 years), they have become increasingly angry and hateful, hateful towards all authority figures and institutions whatsoever, towards ethnic minorities, Jews, foreigners, and especially the WOMEN (note that I am not contending the legitimacy or illegitimacy for any of these targets of male ire).

Meanwhile, the women themselves have been advancing in school, work, and have been shattering records in athletic performance, comedy, film, music, degrees, wealth, entrepreneurship, political office and power, and have likewise now found themselves not only able to have sex with whomever they so choose, but are actually having sex with more men than ever, and not just any men, but the top-shelf men they prefer and pick willingly. Wealthy and athletic top-20% type men are having a hay-day while the vast majority of women (80%) are each getting their turn to ride that cock-carousel of their choosing (whilst 80% of men are condemned to the desert of involuntary celibacy with the bottom 20% of women). "The future is female" is now a slogan so cliché that it has become passé and tiring. Now it is also true, that as with the men, women are also increasingly overweight, unreliable, and unhappy (interestingly, women "let themselves go" for the opposite reasons of men, men give up when they have no choices, women give up when they have too many). Not only this, but many women, though often being on OnlyFans or experimenting with amateur porn (the numbers on this are truly staggering), actually don't and won't make much money in their lives and will end up raising a child or two by themselves in their forties while still supporting, ideologically, the same stupidity that got them there to begin with.

Now, this is all well and good in terms of observing the society at large, reflecting on things we have seen in our own lives over time, and studying history, stats, politics, etc, but I can testify that I am also seeing certain things on the ground RIGHT NOW that I have found alarming as someone working in the space of creating Christian communities. This issue has hit close to home and continues to do so.

Its not just theory, it’s not just fear-mongering, it’s brutal, honest, and awful in its reality. Because of this I want to communicate a real sense of urgency to both men and women who are coming into the faith and seeking to live it out in their own lives BUT in this address, unfortunately, I have to focus my rebuke against the women-folk.

You have a serious problem ladies and its time you are held accountable for your actions as a sex and as individuals of that sex. It’s your turn to take a whoopin' in the wood-shed, your brothers aren't the ones in the most trouble for a change. Let’s get it over with.

HARD TRUTH #1: Women are (in general) a much BIGGER problem spiritually, relationally, and societally than the men.

The generalization I made above can be easily corroborated and substantiated in spades, but to explain why it matters is equally important. Truth is, the men, for all their faults, at least know that there IS a real problem in society, a HUGE problem, of historic, civilizational, and biblical proportions. Their behavior alone is proof of this as seen in their pulling out of performing their ancient roles en masse. If birds stopped making nests and cougars stopped hunting deer, we would be rightly alarmed, and yet something no less profound is happening among the sexes of the human race and only the men involved have seemed to notice (and maybe their would-be employers).

Women, for a whole myriad of reasons, are ignorant, both willfully and naively, of the significance of what is going on around them, largely because the system is intentionally structured to benefit them both materially and positionally as has been the case for some time (for more on this I would encourage you to read Occult Feminism by Rachel Wilson). Women are now more successful than men, richer, more educated, and having all options in terms of careers, opportunities, and even sexual partners at their disposal. Indeed, even their failures are fully subsidized by the State. A woman can cheat, leave without cause, and do any amount of evil to her sexual partner and get full custody rights over his children and even his assets with the long-arm of the law in her corner at every juncture. If she gets knocked up and the guy up and disappears, she will be supported the rest of her life with every conceivable welfare benefit and stipend and still have a line of desperate men, of her choosing, to bang her and keep her and her brats company. None of this is true for men, which is why they have woken up and pulled out of everything, a general strike of one sex has begun and it is all because of the women.

Historically, Christian women were known for their obedience, purity, sexual submission to their husbands, and courage against evil of all kinds. It is arguable that the conduct of courageous Christian war-brides in terms of their wifely virtues was what converted the rugged Germanic tribes. No greater case of the meek laying low the proud in true Biblical fashion can possibly be conceived than this, wherein, the unstoppable hordes of Germanic barbarians were brought to heel to the crown of Christ by the very women they captured.

Alexis De Tocqueville in his magnum opus, Democracy in America, argued that among America's virtues, perhaps the two greatest were its women and its religiosity, the latter for its comprehensive and all-consuming nature, and the former for the strange balance of their outspoken intelligence on the one-hand, and their utter obedience and commitment to their domestic role on the other. All of this, since his writing, has eroded beyond recognition.

Many men who are in the traditional Christian faith today, and who are leading the next revival RIGHT NOW, will tell you that the principal Christian influence in their formative years, the ones that were first and most significant in their spiritual development, and who had exposed them to the truths of God, were women. In my own life, it was a dedicated and humble Baptist housewife, a mild-mannered Yankee woman who had faithfully served her boisterous and strong-willed WWII veteran husband from the Deep South and bore him seven children. Though he had died before I was born, she remained and never remarried. Of all the influences on my young psyche, this woman had the most profoundly pure and innocent persona and she of all the adults I knew, was the only one who consistently and persistently made me pray, instilled in me a respect the Lord's Name, took us to church, and exemplified Christian kindness and generosity. Her home cooking and open ear had more of an impact on the man I am today than perhaps any book or professor. Of the many men I have known who have come into the faith today, those who had the seeds of faith sewn in them, had them sewn by women and for this we are in good in company, just read up on St. Augustine and his mother St. Monica from his Confessions for one of a great plethora of examples from Christian history.

Indeed, even after the men had started abandoning the church with its increasing compromise, liberalism, effeminacy, prudery, hypocrisy, and blatant corruption (not to mention being completely boring and uninspiring), the women remained faithful and were often the anchors of faith in the home through the 20th century, especially in rural areas where religion was still somewhat hanging on.

However, the sexual revolution won out eventually (in terms of accomplishing its objectives). The women are liberated now, both urban and rural. As a culture we made our bed and now we have to sleep in it and men were as complicit and enabling of this outcome as much or more than the women themselves, as we alone could actually allow it to happen to begin with. If women went to war with men, it would be over before noon, and yet they have been given sway, control, preference, and power in all spheres of society and we cannot forget this fact as we proceed.

But here we are, this is the shit-sandwich of a world we inherited and now as things are coming full-circle and a revival of the true faith is brewing we are seeing people finally waking up and coming home to the church, and so this begs the question we have been teasing, what are the women coming in the church looking like?

From what I have seen, we have men who know what’s going on in society, how bad it is, and that hardcore traditional Christianity alone can solve these problems. They are aware of the dangers of the institutions, the degree of their corruption, and the pervasiveness of the false-worldview that drives all such negative outcomes.

As for the women? Most have no idea WTF is going on, or only a limited idea, and even if knowing that much is wrong in the world, still instinctively cling to this institution or that with some strange wife-like loyalty as to an abusive husband, often it’s a Stockholm syndrome for public education or the medical system, or democrats, or LGBT people, or whatever, even if it makes no coherent sense with their stated faith and its implications.

The women, even if more educated (and usually in more debt) on paper, are usually FAR more ignorant of the Scriptures, what their faith requires of them, and how the Christian civilization operated for a millennia and because of their "education" are often proud, resistant, and fearful of changing views and practices at the behest of their husband or a church-leader. Likewise, as a consequence of a demonic therapy culture, self-esteem psychology, woke anti-discourse (cancel-culture), a lack of experience of healthy masculinity and traditional patriarchal norms, and a society that panders to them, they are completely unable and usually unwilling to debate their views, or to do so civilly and persistently. They are expected to be granted an argument simply by opening their mouths and if meeting resistance of any kind, get angry, cry, or runaway, and often all three.

Typical with women, is the herd-mentality. Women benefit and have always benefited by conforming to some degree, this is because they are physically weaker and less likely to perceive threats, a factual biological distinction between men and women; however, we are not animals or some statistic in a sociology textbook, we are Christians made in the image of God. Sorry ladies, being normal in this culture is evil and you and your offspring are in danger by trying to be like everyone else and not standing out. Even if it benefited you in the past to lay-low and fly under the radar, this time around it could cost you your very soul. Indeed the hope now is that a woman's desire for a mate will outweigh their desire to fit-in and indeed, the whole fate of civilization rests on that gamble that we have no choice but to make.

From my experience and the experience of many others coming in this space, the Christian women we have met coming into Christian churches and projects are often doing so for the following reasons: (1) escaping an estranged lover and/or a relationship that was immoral at its core for a whole plethora of possible reasons. (2) Trying to find acceptance and penance for a wicked sexual past for which they now carry great guilt, often due to the fact that it was a hoe-phase falling-away from a faith they were raised in during their youth. (3) because their far-more conservative husband and boyfriend is "making them" join or go along even though they would prefer to just go with the flow, be normal, plugged in, and have a cool pinterest or instagram that makes their fellow girl-boss friends jealous. (4) because they are completely aimless in life due to having a bad or estranged family-situation combined with a worthless degree or no skills leaving them with no home to return to, no prospects of wealth or upward mobility, and who are only looking at the church or community because they are fast approaching "the wall," and realize they need to find some security before their only value, their sexual value, depletes further. (5) [and most rarely] they are either searching for a solid Christian husband for Christian-reasons or are fully dedicated to following Christ and serving the Kingdom and are aligned with our vision.

Notice that #5 is "more rare" by which I mean that it is almost non-existent. Of all the reasons for a woman to join a Christian community project and the trad-faith, doing so for reasons 1-4 are FAR LESS desirable on the part of any Christian project and the proof is in the pudding. These women, the majority, are often joining because they have failed in their life-choices and feel that they have no other options. It’s like that fall-back "nice-guy" that they would never sleep with, EVER, until the alpha bad boy finally beats her and her kids up to the point that she digs up that old friend-zoned beta's number and asks if she can get a ride to his place. The church of Christ, and all the men within, are now expected to be every washed-up woman's white-knight simp, and we are fine with this arrangement? The Kingdom of Christ ladies, will NEVER be your plan-B. It will be your plan A or it will be your spiritual reckoning, your place of lifelong commitment with courage and honor, or your place of lifelong repentance and subjugation.

Regarding #3, with the wives who are only joining because their based husbands are "forcing them," at least we can say they are being "obedient" and "supportive" to some extent and with such women there is the hope that they can change overtime, the Scriptures teach this of all Christians in general, but especially of wives, for husbands are called to "sanctify" their wives and present them holy before God; however, that many of them are luke-warm on this idea is attributable to much of what we discussed already, that they are ideologically not "one-flesh" yet with their own husbands for their unity is but skin-deep. You cannot build a marriage merely on common-hobbies and a good-lay twice a week, for when serious matters come into view, like parenting and lifestyle, those whose marriage is not built on the rock, will see their house fall amidst the storm.

However, going back to the other three kinds of women, I will say it again, that the church cannot be a woman's fall-back plan. Yes, the church is tasked with taking in the broken and needy, but Christian community projects have been disbanded and destroyed by women bringing with them their custody disputes or crazy exes (an issue with divorced men as well, not just women). Likewise, from the perspective of the ministry, the sincerity of such women is unproven and improvable through any ordinary means of vetting. After all, if a woman is only marrying you because she doesn't want to be alone at 40, does she REALLY love you for you? Same applies to Christian community, and once reality hits and conflict arises, they are sure to bail. We have seen it DIRECTLY AND PERSONALLY in our own project and any time we have made an exception to not-admitting a single or divorced woman, we have regretted it within less than 3 months time without a single deviation or exception whatsoever.

Ultimately, MOST single women who would want to join should be categorized under #5 if they were doing it for pure, honest, and Christian motivations. They would either be committed to the Christian vision we have proposed or they would be dedicated to finding a husband with such a view. In essence, such motivations would be what one would expect from sincere Christian women with sincere Christian convictions. That this is not the case shows how low quality the women are in America and among those who would claim the name of Christ. This is to your SHAME women, if that word even still means anything to your sex at all......

"But what about the men?!" you ask in protest!

Can you handle the truth ladies? The fact is that the VAST majority of men who are joining are doing so because they believe in the project and its vision, and if not already married, are looking for sincere Christian wives and think that being settled and involved in such a project will increase their chances. You know what that means ladies? In essence, it means that the majority of men, who are trying to join Christian projects RIGHT NOW, are doing it for the right reasons; whilst the majority of women are NOT. Indeed, many of the wives of many of the men joining, though better than the average, still retain many of these hang-ups and issues as stated above, and often the very commitment and sincerity and sacrifice that such a project will demand is itself creating marital strife with many couples as the women are increasingly exposed in their weakness of faith, and perhaps even a lack of true faith at all.

SOLUTIONS:

I can honestly say, I don't have a solution to this, or at least not one I am able to do or implement myself. Desperate women, unfortunately, are going to be the main ones who apply and the volume is, in my opinion, likely to only increase with time as our society continues to leave scores of chicks broken in its wake. Like lambs to the slaughter on a conveyor belt to hell, women continue to be rolled out of high school into the system that propagandizes them, defiles them, and robs them of their best years and which leaves them pretty broken and really crazy, the materialists might like to call this "mental illness" but in reality its spiritual oppression. Babylon has become a dwelling place for demons and the women have them swarming about their head like flies around a horse's ass.

I wish it was not the case, God knows that this is true, but we have no choice as a project and any experiments to find an exception have been disastrous. As a matter of policy, the community should not take single or divorced women as a general rule, but families in the community may take single women on as household servants and can be their sponsors for the purpose of either courting them off with some eligible and interested single male in the village, or to transition them into being a sort-of pass-around nanny/nun type hybrid that works for the church and for families in the community (maybe we can call them "nunnies"); however, such women must and will have strict rules imposed upon them, high expectations for obedience, and will be allowed no authority over anything in the community at all whatsoever.

For men who are struggling with their wives, prayer for them is essential by all in the village and the solid women must attempt to reach the struggling wives and encourage them, instruct them, and even rebuke them if necessary, but most of all, we must teach without words, by exemplifying a life that is objectively better than what the world offers and we must hope that the combined efforts of their husbands instructing them (which they MUST do at all costs) and the constant and faithful preaching of the Holy Scriptures will in time bring them around to accepting with joy the life we are offering in the village, a goal for which we are all striving.

HARD TRUTH #2: The women are more traumatized and propagandized than the men. They really ARE victims and its okay for us to acknowledge that, but they must repent nonetheless, trauma is never an excuse for sin, only an explanation for it.

*Let me start by clarifying that I will be using words like "trauma" which originate and are popular in psychology, but I am not using them in a technical pathologizing sense, but in vernacular and colloquial sense of "difficult events or circumstances of life that leave lasting effects on one's personality and ability to cope and move forward in their life and sanctification, such often leaving scars of irrational fears and various proclivities towards certain specific sins."

I don't want to downplay the fact that men are traumatized by our society, especially by the violence of public school and the pervasive perversity of pornography and whoring women. I myself still don't like changing in locker rooms or peeing next to another man in a public restroom and would never use a public shower because of the horrors I witnessed in school and I have avoided a Smartphone until around the time of COVID (even as a millennial) and only use my computer in the company of others, all because of the fear of pornography capturing me again as it had in my youth, and until the last few years, it was easy for me to lose my temper and try to throw down with any man who had insulted me personally or challenged me (which is how I got out of the cycle of being bullied as a teenager). NONE of these spiritual scars would have been issues for me had it not been for the years I spent in the State schools during my most formative years. Many men I know struggle with similar things, so it absolutely true that men have real problems and I am not downplaying that in discussing women.

However, men are still tough at their core and often seem to weather this trauma better than women and have learned to sublimate (focus/channel) this trauma in better ways than women. As has always been the case in the past, the men seem capable of shaking it off and moving on from the pain of their past in ways women cannot do so easily.

Likewise, though both sexes have been propagandized, the misandry and blatant anti-patriarchal tone of the propaganda of the 21st century, combined with the lack of hope for their own futures, has driven most men to question and ultimately reject this propaganda and instead turn towards varying degrees of right-wing, red-pilled, and traditional Christian and religious perspectives on a whole myriad of subjects.

By contrast, the women have been traumatized in several disturbing ways. Firstly, they are traumatized sexually much earlier. Indeed, the sexualization of children we have seen at the hands of the LGBT movement in public schools has been patterned by a much earlier attempt to do so to our daughters. At the time of the sexual revolution, the goal was to free female chastity from the expectations of classical Christian monogamy. Hence, sexually explicit dance, once only reserved for the stripping pole, are now mainstream in actual dance classes for minors as young as 9 (and then we wonder why Muslims want to blow them up, though ironically enough, Muhammad might have been kinda into it).

Sex education (that is, knowledge of sexual behavior and reproductive anatomy), has always been more of an interest to the sexually driven, aggressive, and initiatory male-mind and this has been the case in all ages as reported by sources such as Cicero, St. Augustine, Chaucer, Shakespeare, and Jonathan Edwards (teen boys were being disciplined for stealing midwife handbooks to gawk and chuckle-at behind the barn in Puritan New England for crying out loud!). However, after the sexual revolution, sex education changed to being co-ed or specifically more class-based and female oriented. Because the advent of such sexual education coincided and even originated with the takeover of our institutions by secularists and Marxists, such sexual instruction has only served to pathologize and enlighten young girls who would have otherwise been more innocent and less inclined to any understanding of carnal knowledge whatsoever as compared to their male counter-parts, indeed many women dwelt in relative ignorance of all such matters right up until their courting years, at the earliest (e.g. my grandmother didn't even know what a homosexual was until she was 23 and was mortified that such a thing existed. My how things have changed!).

Make no mistake, the impetus for "safe sex" has been put on women, the man was never trusted to keep a condom on his person and this was taught explicitly by sex-educators in the public schools and so hormonal birth control and IUDs and every new iteration has been pushed on girls and the responsibility for preventing natural human reproduction whilst being entirely sexually available to whomever they so choose, has been placed on our girls and this has been indoctrinated into them from every imaginable institution, especially the education and medical systems and the reasoning behind this was always explicitly from a perspective of eugenics, population control, and even a stated desire to undermine traditional religious teaching and practices for the purpose of liberating women from their ancient, traditional, and biologically-driven roles. Long before the Trans controversy, our women were being groomed as little girls to become little whores in their teens. Our daughters were custom-made by our institutions into becoming cum-dumpsters of death to future generations that would otherwise have been born into healthy families, now destined to never to exist at all. Our women were made into weapons of war against the growth and perpetuity of their own people and the end of organic kingdom growth (this has been part of the pagan playbook since the epic of Gilgamesh and the institution of temple prostitution). "There is nothing new under the sun" and Satan never sleeps.

What I just stated above is literally only one small piece of the puzzle, a piece that would perhaps have been ineffective by itself if every other aspect of Christian society and family had been healthy; however, as I have already stated, the sexual behavior of women, has been largely the result of a broader societally-caused trauma. How so? Because the lack of strong and moral men has deeply damaged their minds and emotions. Firstly, without strong fathers, girls are raised insecure and desperate for male attention which further promotes promiscuity and the cycle of trauma and early sexual experiences (usually with slightly older porn-addicted teen boys) as they gravitate towards male attention of any kind. If this was not bad enough, many women are now growing up with a total ignorance of what a strong man looks like and how he would behave. Part of the reason for this is that the "men" that are in their lives, especially the ones that beget them and their peers, were often "strong" in all the wrong ways, displaying real abusive traits or, oppositely, total apathy, indifference, and laziness. Because women are more conformable to group-dynamics by natural design and because they are more dependent on male-authority and influence to properly form them, the lack of patriarchal families is FAR more damaging to young girls than to young boys and that is really saying something as the stats for negative outcomes for boys raised without fathers is itself truly staggering. The lack of example of male analytic rationality has made women more emotionally erratic and selfishly demanding of others, the lack of firm rules and authority has made them spoiled and entitled, and the lack of severe and heavy-handed disciplinary consequences has made them faithless, unreliable, dishonest, dishonorable, rebellious, and irrationally fearful of real and legitimate authority.

When you add to this godless therapy, psychology, DEI, and the neo-Gnostic heresy of new age spirituality, you have a recipe for self-indulgent, prideful, and sexually degenerate women who feel no moral accountability for their actions because there were never any men, and definitely any institutions, that ever held them accountable for anything.

The overall consequences of this are women who are full of pride, assume themselves as being sexual objects whenever it will benefit them without any guilt or shame, and have no fear of consequences since none are ever enforced against them and in having no real understanding of men other than penis size, bail the moment a man raises his voice or contradicts her emotionally-derived desires and decisions.

SOLUTION Part A:

Now obviously, part of the solution to this from the male perspective, practically speaking, is taking the "no-fucks-given" approach. You want your new wife to cook but she doesn't know how and has no desire because she knows you can? The solution is simple, don't cook, only eat ramen, hot-dogs, and granola bars day-in and day-out, hunger-strike her until she capitulates, refuse to eat out, and never pay or help to pay for takeout and always eat the most of anything she brings home. Trust me, that chick will either learn to cook or hit the road. Is she giving you guff and embarrassing you in public? embarrass her in response and give it to her right back, and don’t you EVER act like you are afraid of her leaving you, in fact, you need to act the opposite, "don't like how I do things woman? Don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out, there are scores of other chicks that would want a piece of this," and say it like you mean it and believe it (whether it’s true or not) and don't back down, you will win, you are the stronger sex, never let a challenge go unanswered or problem unresolved, fight it out every-time until she surrenders, things will change if she does actually love and give a shit about you, she will eventually realize that you won't let her get away with bad behavior and will soon find that it’s not worth the trouble to start problems, and when she does occasionally do it in the future, it will be a test to make sure YOU still give a shit about her enough to stand-up to her idiocy and still have a pair of functioning balls between your legs.

In the midst of this, men ALSO need to explain the mysteries of their own gender to women. They need to explain how the male sex drive works and how all-consuming it can be, the instinct towards honor and respect and why this is essential for men for them to be mentally healthy, the analytical side of male-thinking and why logic is so important, the masculine drive to provide and protect and why female vulnerability fits this instinct, the need for peace and solace in the home especially after having to work long hours at a crappy job, and the need to be fed and nurtured by a wife, to feel cared for, especially when sick, tired, hungry, or horny. Men need to know that their needs are regarded and that when the chips are down, their woman will still love them and is not merely there JUST because of what he provides in peak health and wealth, he needs to know that if he becomes disabled in the line of masculine duty, that she won't leave him for a new meal ticket, that when they are poor, they'll happily clip coupons together and that she won't be blowing the neighbor next-door in his new Camaro.



I would argue this is all very necessary because, contrary to common opinion, women understand men far less than men understand women. The culture and film have told us that this is the opposite of the case, but I am telling you now that this is 100% false and this is rationally undeniable upon simple reflection, for (if you really think about it) men have every motivation, sexually and relationally, to fully understand and manipulate women because they are always trying to get in their pants, women have always been a practical focus of intense study for most straight men from a very early age (they are THE commodity principally desired by all men). This being said, women by contrast have almost no incentive to learn anything about men at all other than flashing their tits to get what they want when crying and complaining has failed. If women do know one thing about men, it’s that men WANT them sexually and that their "assents" can be used as currency to get thing they want in life that only men can give them, a truth they soon learn not long after their rump and breasts begin to bulge in shapely form. Beyond this however, women know very little about the opposite sex and therapy has programmed them to have a lesbian's view of men and masculinity. Misandry and ignorance abound in the female mind now from a very early age and nearly every "female professional" in their life only ever confirmed and reinforced this, you could even say that the health and accuracy of female education is directly proportional to how much of this they have received from religious housewives, which should tell you how bad the situation actually is.

Here is a little deprogramming for your ladies: It is not abuse if your man gets frustrated and yells at you, and if he grabs you or puts you in a headlock when you try to stab him with a kitchen knife, he is more than justified in doing so. Can I get an amen sisters?! Or at least a "Duh"? If not, maybe you’re a bit brainwashed still. Maybe you do need smacked around a bit.

For the women, part of the solution can only be learning and overcoming the psychobabble bullshit they have been spoon-fed from the time they could read. Men are masculine, they demand respect, even from other men, but especially from women and will NEVER be happy without it, respect and general obedience to his honest will is every bit as important for a man as being shown love and consideration is to a woman. Not only this, but women, especially who have converted after a life of immorality, must understand male jealousy is both moral and justified and is not merely some "weak insecurity" or "male fragility."

God is absolute, perfect, and all-powerful, but He is a jealous God, that is literally how He describes Himself in Holy Scripture. GOD is jealous for His bride the church and He is incensed, disgusted, and angered by our whoring after other gods and raising anything above Him in any area of life whatsoever. Men are first and foremost, even before women, made after the pattern, image, and likeness of God, that is why you can't have "guy-friends" anymore after you get married and why he doesn't want you going to clubs or bars without him or hanging out with that one slutty friend of yours "who just needs someone to talk to." Nope, that crap is done once you say "I do," and it probably should have been done away with long before you even took the vows. Further, this in-born image-bearing jealousy in men, and no other reason, is why men DO care about your body count and your sexual past and it will always bother them until they are dead.

A man can forgive a woman's past and he should forgive this past for a woman he loves just as God has forgiven us for our whoring after idols and breaking His Law, but (that being said) just as our life as Christians is to be marked by gratitude, obedience, and service for such a great mercy and grace, so too women who have been defiled by the world ought to have such a disposition towards any husband that takes them on. Men are due, as their natural right, virgin wives, and it doesn't matter how "rare" virgins are nowadays (a disgusting fact in itself), by taking you (a non-virgin) on as a wife he is showing you an undeserved kindness and you yourself, in a true Christian society, would be on the discount rack as a far as eligible wives are concerned and would be so for even one instance of promiscuous indiscretion, and if you were ever caught whoring around and lying about it to him to pass yourself off as innocent, you would have been killed on your father's doorstep and justly so. That is how far we have fallen. Make no mistake ladies, your lack of innocence when you first entered your husband's bed is your shame and is no joke or simple sin, it’s a stain you cannot wash away. Your husband, if he be a Christian with any real fear of God will forgive you, but he can never fully forget and get over it. Women seem only content to make this worse in every way out of ignorance and programming, or childish reactionary behavior, but the solution is far easier and far more difficult at the same time. Brace yourself, what I’m about to say is spicy.

SOLUTION Part B:

Ladies, I will not mince words with you here, you are the way you are because of your sin nature, the fallen world in which we dwell, the curse put upon you by God for the evil of your first mother Eve and the sexualization and indoctrination of our secular and wicked society.

However, like us men, and all flesh, you will still have to give account on the last day for every act and idle word. Every penis you pleased that was not your husbands will be held against you and you will stand before a Holy God to give account for each one.

Thus, if a husband, mirroring the character of Christ Himself, is willing to stand the gap and take the punishment for your act of robbing him of His rights as your lord and king in your whoring, then your ONLY proper response is a life-long dedication to him with loyalty, gratitude, appreciation, joy, peace, fidelity, and service. You honestly deserve a beating, and in most of our history such would have been allowed to men to give you, and so if you leave or despise your husband for merely rebuking you, contradicting you, correcting you, or even hollering at you in frustration, than you are nothing but an ungrateful and despicable rebel against him and God. You should fear God and your husband as God's representative over YOU. This is not something to run away from, but something to run towards. You may have a pussy, but that doesn't mean you need to act like one. Toughen up ladies! You are embarrassing your fore-mothers who are shaking their heads from heaven! Their ability to be faithful and humble housewives in Christian marriages for 70 years and a dozen kids to men who were rough, imperfect, and sometimes violent is still the gold standard, these women built Christendom and their good moral conduct often made their men into BETTER men of God. If your behavior is not so biblical that it drives your husband towards deeper faith, then you are failing, be like Sarah who called her husband "lord" and all those holy women that the apostles, over and over again, raise up as examples. Their obedience raised up kings and brought down empires, just read Esther, her conduct, conversation, and sex appeal before the eyes of her husband, saved millions of (Old Testament) Christian lives.

Speaking of sex appeal, when it comes to sex itself, your faithful submission to your husband's sexual needs and his will to make use of your body to satisfy his burning desires is your absolute and unequivocal obligation. The dog-house is a forbidden sin and the forbidding of the use of yourself to assist Him in getting-off is utterly wicked and the Scriptures leave ZERO ambiguity on this fact, read Proverbs 5 and 1 Corinthians 7 and try to levy any objection to this fact of our religion. Let me also say, that this service you owe your husband is ESPECIALLY true if you knew any man before him sexually. If you EVER gave up the nookie for some dude at a party or on a first date and yet attempt to make your husband go through hurdles and score a perfect A on his personal conduct card in order to earn a quickie by the end of the week, then you are a committing an evil so great that the gates of hell are wide-opened and waiting for you. If you were easy for any man before him, then you should be a thousand times easier for him, if you were a cum-slut for some scummy college boys in the back of car, you should be a thousand times sluttier for him wherever he so demands it! Your penance as an impure woman coming into marriage is, a sexual penance, to endeavor with all your might and strength to keep him sexually satisfied and well-quenched until he can no longer get it up or either you or he enters the grave for your final rest. There can be no area where you would not do 1000 times more for him than any other dude you knew before; your life-long duty is to make sure there will never be any doubt in his mind regarding the fact that he is the greatest in YOUR mind. This is how you make it right, this is how you pay the debt you owe, and even virgin wives are expected to not deny their husband of his conjugal rights, just as a man is not permitted to deny such rights to his wife, but for you impure ones, your demand in this area is even greater, you should give and expect nothing in return and ANY pleasure he deigns to give you should move you to tears of humble gratitude. You should NOT ever again close your womb in murderous rebellion to God's design to grow His church with children, for every seed that was spilled by any man by your participation shall be held against you as one more potential image bearer or church-member you kept from coming into being, and that is not even taking into account any abortions you may have had, which is murder par excellence. If your husband wants some head, you better suck that dick enthusiastically for your own sanctification like the bride of Solomon had done before her king and husband and you better finish the job with a wink and a smile. You ought to accept every sex act he demands (within the bounds of God's law) with the humility of a servant and learn to find joy and pleasure in performing it. You are doing God's work, you are being made a better Christian by being your husband's well-spring of pleasure and God's matrimonial grace will be granted to you more abundantly with every orgasm you give him and every child you bear for him. You may be tempted to think, in feeling guilt for your sinful past, that sex is dirty and now when married you stupidly feel that you need to be less sexual, less aroused, less interested, less playful, less fun, less adventurous, and less easy, some of you are even ashamed to undress in front of your own husbands! BUT, the fact is, that you are actually paying for your debt by robbing again the man who took you as his wife, you are hurting him TWICE! You, under a false pretense of piety and repentance are actually doubling your sin and heaping judgment upon yourself. Don't fall into that temptation and stupidity, you belong to him and you need to act like it with gusto and the zeal of religious passion, for your sexual fidelity is what keeps him away from lust and sin and keeps him strong, loyal, and more Godly. It is no wonder, with what Scripture commands of married women, that their conduct converted the barbarians when they robbed our girls for brides, a biblical wife is the most coveted and powerful force on planet earth and this is why the secularists have worked so hard to destroy them. Stop being a victim to lies and emotions, be a courageous woman of fiery faith, even when your ankles are behind your ears, for this is your contribution to building the next Christian Empire and it’s a heck of a lot easier than actually building buildings, so get over yourselves, you’re not being asked to join the army or weld a bridge in -13F weather, let’s not overcomplicate what your being asked to do and you'll probably get off too if you nice about it and have your mind in the right place, which should always be on your husband and your desire to pleasure him.

So here are your marching orders women: Keep his stomach full and his balls empty, obey his honest will, and keep the peace; God wills it. That’s it. It is as simple as it is difficult. Just like I said it would be. Don't like it? Bring it up with God, I’m just the messenger. I refer you to the manual.

Lastly, if you ever allow adultery to cross your mind, never forget that you deserve nothing less than the death penalty and if you are excommunicated for it, have only Hell to look forward to.

HARD TRUTH 3: The women are more anti-social and materialistic than the men and this was not always so.

There was a time in our history when women were far more social, and I don't mean on social-media. Now, I will grant that women continue to maintain the air of being social and often they have more "friends" in terms of peers etc then men, especially at work, and often regard many of them as "close"; however, for many of these women, such is a superficial and public friendship more than it is a real intimate friendship and camaraderie. A follower on instagram, an old friend from school, and some co-miserating co-workers are often the typical medley for most women and occasionally they want to take each other out for a coffee at starbucks or to a club or bar for a "girls night;" however, these friends are misleading. It is known that men are struggling statistically to have close friends and women seem to not be struggling as much, but female suicide rates among teens actually show us that distinction between the sexes on this is misleading and mostly because women are not honest. Because women derive value from in-group preference and conformity, many of their "friends" are merely avatars for their own sense of security and belonging, a gauge that they are "accepted" and "normal," when in reality when it comes to real, trusted, ethical, and accountable friends, most women have about as many "real" friends as most men, which isn't very many. This is worse for women who break from the world to enter into Christianity.

Part of what makes this especially harder for Christian women is that they often have to break away from these old peer-networks in order to jump into their faith, and often times this is not only justified, but rationally and ethically necessary. If all your friends were hard-partying boss-babe sluts, then in becoming a Christian there is a real obligation to separate yourself from such people as much as possible. However, as brave and honorable as this is for women to do, they have a really hard time getting plugged back into a new social network of Christian female peers.

Part of this is insecurity, women are quick to judge their standing by comparing themselves to other women, so if a formerly worldly woman enters into a group of Christian women, it is easy for her to compare herself and find herself lacking when compared to Christian women who may have been in their walk longer. The more traditionalist and hardcore the Christian movement they join, the even more difficult and extreme this becomes. Women often, when feeling inadequate for their new peer group and fearful of being judged, will often withdraw rather than confront their lack or show humility before women who are further along in their sanctification and Christian experience. This reaction however is counter-productive, sinful, and leads to greater temptation towards either complete apathy (stalling out their progress in the faith) or reentering their worldly peer group, where at least now they could lift themselves up with a sense of moral and familial superiority as compared to the single chicks still living for themselves or still existing with some dead-beat boyfriend. At this point, a Christian husband becomes more of a "trophy-husband" where their masculine and reliable man is displayed more to make their friends jealous than out of any real sincere commitment to the values of the faith.

There have been examples from men in our own group of wives who were "hardcore" in being a "home school mom" and even braggadocious about such whilst they were in those circles, but as soon as they were divorced and remarried with "new peers" with "new standards" they dropped homeschooling altogether and stuck the kids back in public school. Hypocritical? Yes, but the main underlying issue is the lack of real conviction and doing things only to fit in with certain social networks, in this case homeschooling moms, something that is by no means bad itself, but doing it for such a superficial and insincere reason is absolutely NOT good. Hence, women we have experienced often really struggle making friends with other Christian women upon entering the church and community; whilst the men, are already prepared to die in battle together and toasting glasses of beer and singing songs around the table after hours of passionate debating. This gap must be bridged.

Related to this is the materialism. Men can be materialistic, they can be obsessed with their "toys" like motorcycles, customized guns, fishing boats, cowboys hats, etc, but in general, as the meme goes, men are okay living with very little, a camp chair, mattress and TV in an empty room will do most men just fine. This is not the case with women and is a big part of the problem, and is probably the biggest problem facing the sex as a whole.

Women, in our culture, have a hard time letting go of their comforts, part of this is feeling entitled due to how they were raised. Some girls “might” have been taught how to reload the dishwasher, run a microwave, and vacuum a carpet, but most have not been made to actually work domestically. So what do they do? They consume and enjoy the comforts of modern America. If they cook, it’s because they took it up as a hobby to satiate some desire to try something they could not readily buy or order. Combine this with the cultural factors mentioned above, and women typically enjoy quite a bit of ease, the domestic role is not expected of them anymore in the way that the bread-winning is still somewhat expected of men, and so whilst men are still measured in terms of their income, women are emphatically NOT measured in terms of their domestic competence, and often, if domestically-challenged, will make arrangements for their boyfriend or husband to share the responsibility. The hurdle this poses for women seeking a traditional lifestyle in a village setting should go without saying. They are entirely unequipped for day-to-day difficulties regarding childrearing and caring for the home. Indeed, a detailed-oriented dinner and two kids at home is enough to make some of them crack-up and crash-out.

Beyond this, their continual measurement of men in terms of their job and salary in spite of their own domestic insufficiency is hypocritical and infantile. They want their man’s credit card to blow on Amazon or Temu, and have no concept of balancing the checkbook and making sure the bills are paid-up (a problem with both sexes to some degree) as financial literacy, once taught along domestic skills in home-economics classes, is no longer existent in most public education settings. Forget driving a beater to save money, eating leftovers, having to cook from scratch, and repair clothing. In fact, even the idea of financial dependency on a man is hard for them to swallow as if it were an existential threat and risk to their personal well-being, when in reality, even if their husband were the sole provider she would still win out in a court of law in taking what was his and living the rest of her life on a combination of welfare benefits and child-support.

Now when we combine this with social media (a lack of any REAL collective in-group), then we end up seeing a whole online culture of female-driven covetousness and the click-bait of envy. This is seen with the development of trends on instagram and pinterest and also correlates to women not only accepting insane left-wing propaganda out of a desire to “fit in” but also to engage in self-mutilation to meet some female "invented" beauty standards. Not only are old sins like bulimia and anorexia alive and well, but we have the addition of women increasingly desiring some idealized version of a man that some of these women online have obtained, with all the material comforts that come with such a person. Hence, through a very manufactured social consensus online, women are made into maximalist consumers of every trendy gadget, lip-filler, plastic surgery, convenience, make-up line, and appliance that China can pump out and they are taught to find the sort of men that can provide such from them indefinitely and all because their illusory online tribe told them to.

SOLUTION: Voluntary/Artificial Poverty and Forced Fellowship.

The only solution to this is not only for women to be willfully and purposefully dependent on their husbands financially (no longer working outside the home, combining accounts etc), but also to embrace artificial poverty, minimalism, and increasing primitivism on purpose.

BUT!!

you will say:

“Women today cannot handle living that way anymore, without anyone teaching them or showing them, such work is impossible for them to do and they can’t handle the stress and anxiety to learn such.”

True, just as many men struggle to perform well in job interviews or even maintain a job, just as all of those seeking the trad-life or homesteading have found it difficult to manage and learn such old and labor-intensive skills, so too the women of our time are poorly prepared and suited to the trad-life. This is undeniable and universal to both sexes in point of fact.

BUT that is also why community is so important, that is why women must be forced to fellowship with other traditional and anti-materialistic women. Maybe a woman raised as an only child in a upper middle-class suburb can’t be expected to go straight from loading a dishwasher three times a week to hand-washing and hand-drying 180-200 dishes per day (like my own women have to); however, she could take turns washing and drying, or taking either the washing or the drying with another woman while they chit-chat, right? There ARE ways to ease them in, train them, and build them.

Maybe they would learn to crochet by learning it with other women who are also trying to save money by making new beanies and mittens for their kids for winter? Maybe they’ll learn to cook if other women show them how to mix up the batter and knead the dough?

Examples could be multiplied, but women need to be FORCED by their husbands to fellowship with other women that will benefit them to be around and need to remove themselves or be removed from associating with women who would lead them into materialism, fads, and the acceptance of degeneracy as “loving and tolerant.”

Women need to learn to have faith in dependency on their husband, have enough humility to realize that their student debt for a job they don’t need and shouldn’t have was stupid, and that they SHOULD live with less on purpose regardless of what they have the financial means for. In fact, wearing clothes they make or bought from good-will should be an immediate start. No more nail salons, fancy hair-styles, and gawdy jewelry. No more expensive and immodest attire, no more new vehicles, no more “shopping days” and luxury items. No more trendy nonsense. Thrift stores, scratch cooking, yard-sales, leftovers, hands-and-knees scrubbing, clothing repair, and hand-washing dishes will do a lot of modern women a lot of good, and other Christian women being there to teach them, support them, and share the load with them is essential to not breaking their fragile mental states in the process of this necessary refinement.

HARD TRUTH 4: The Women are more prone to importing and extracting error in their zeal, if they even have any to begin with.

Another interesting thing about the female sex is that religious zeal is not unnatural to them. I have spoken much of how men have, in their zeal, been returning to the traditional Christian faith and right-wing politics, but the women in these circles can be especially fired up.

Overall, this is a good thing as we want women to have sincere and serious convictions and be on fire for the Lord, but there is a dark side to this as well that we should explore.

Often when we see women get passionate about their conservatism and Christianity, especially if they develop such out of self-study or an “awakening,” they become puffed up with pride and see their accomplishments in knowledge as confirming their natural brilliance and skill. Even more so than the men, we will see these women become vocal, even obnoxious, on social media as if they were some prophetess. Women who can’t decide on an appetizer from a restaurant’s menu now can tell the rest of the world the “right” interpretation of the faith and the most successful political strategies for Trump’s advisors? I call BS.

If one looks at the political right, we see this playing out with Tomi Lahren and many of these conservative “career women” (your Megyn Kelly’s etc.), when they publicly decide to circle the wagons around the right of women to work, the preach, to minister, and to lead.

But let us be clear, there is nothing traditional, conservative, or Christian about this. Margaret Thatcher may have been a “political conservative” but she was no ACTUAL conservative, for if she were, she would know that women should NOT take such positions of authority. Women are a curse when they rule, women are not to teach or usurp authority over men, and women are to be silent in the churches.

Women pastors, like the one who has frequently prayed over trump as the so-called “representative” of American evangelicals, are anathema for their usurpation of biblical hierarchy and such must be dismissed as if they were a petulant child attempting to instruct an adult in how to properly execute his 30+ year career. We should have no less dismissive disdain for the usurping words of wound-up women online or in the media. Honestly, these women probably just need dicked down more, which was the medieval solution to "hysteria" (from the Greek word for "uterus") which was rightly diagnosed as a condition of female nuttiness caused by a lack of orgasms (however, i'm just speculating here, though I may have some "clinical experience" in this area to inform my opinion haha....).

Women who are TRULY and sincerely zealous for God’s Word will subjugate themselves to male authority with the same zeal as any other doctrine or else their commitment to those other doctrines ought to be duly questioned. You can’t love God’s Word only where it is convenient. What would we say of a man who was passionate about God’s Word, except where it called him to sacrifice and provide for his family? Nothing good, I assure you, and yet we give women a pass on this when we feel that they are generally and ostensibly on “our side.”

No more ladies, as the Rock used to say on WWE when i was a kid, its time to "know your role and shut your mouth."

SOLUTION: Head Coverings and Public Subjugation to Male Authority Everywhere.

One of the challenges facing Christians in the near future is how to deal with our women. The Divine order will return and it will come as a crashing hammer upon the women of the world. Whether this is due to civilizational collapse, severe economic downturns, or a Jesus Revolution, the results will be the same. The era of the rule of women, of gynocentrism, of the "kali yuga," will end.

In its stead will come undefiled patriarchy, pure and powerful, uncompromising, unashamed, and unwilling to make the same mistakes twice.

In some ways, the new patriarchy may be more severe, more “misogynistic” than the old patriarchy and I would spare our women the suffering that must come with this overdue shift by encouraging them to take proactive steps RIGHT NOW.

Firstly, that Christian women, and women in general, insist on wearing pants all the time like men, including the allegedly "feminine" girl jeans and leggings that reveal every pore on their ass cheeks to the world around them, just needs to just stop. I don’t care if this makes me sound like an old fuddy-duddy from the 1950s, it really is ridiculous. Do men wear dresses? Is this acceptable for us to do? No, of course not, it was with the slow-walk of feminism that women started dressing like men and with this, increasingly sexualized themselves so as to differentiate the sort of masculine imitation that would have accused them of lesbian homosexuality (though post-third wave feminism is seemingly fine with that), so much have female pants "needed" to sexualized that their are whole porn categories and fetishes built up around "tight-jeans" and "yoga--pants". How about you women dress in dresses, you know, the distinctly female way of dressing for thousands of years?! They are still hot to us men (not to mention easy access, wink-wink nod-nod), and such tells the world that you are conservative and likely even Christian. Its a no-brainer, start there, step one.

But lets continue along this double standard to reveal more solutions to the stupidity of female rebellion and liberation shall we?

Are not men also expected to remove their hats in church, or during solemn ceremonies?

What are the women expected to do?

Nothing of course, which is in keeping with the low expectations we have for them in general, but until the National Organization for Women (NOW) did a major campaign to burn all head coverings, all Christian women for nearly two millennia went with their heads covered, at least in church, and usually everywhere in public. Their dress and their covering marked their status, their rank, and now even “Godly” women hold such a suggestion in pure derision and scorn, like a formerly free-ranging mutt growling at a collar and leash.

In our project, the exact stance one takes on head coverings or wearing jeans is regarded as a head of household matter, and it is outside the scope of my work here to get into a full exegetical case for the practice, but let it suffice for me to say, that even if the entirety of God’s people got the issue of head coverings wrong until feminism straightened out our doctrine for us (which you would need to be an idiot to believe), and the practice was always merely a “cultural one” developed by St. Paul solely in response to the depraved, feministic, and pagan culture of 1st century Corinth, even with such unnecessary concessions, that cultural argument would still FULLY justify the prescription of head coverings for women today, RIGHT NOW.

After all, our women ARE out of control NOW, our culture IS depraved NOW, our culture IS pagan NOW, and so if head coverings was culturally imposed in the first century in Corinth for those reasons, than it absolutely SHOULD be imposed culturally NOW on our women in the west today (I say west, because this is not so controversial among the eastern and oriental churches that lacked a feminist movement).

Let me be clear on this solution, Head Coverings and Dresses should be pushed, promoted, and propagandized into every woman and she should believe as consequence that she MUST have a symbol of authority placed upon her objectively and publicly in such a way that any person in any station that happens to see here KNOWS that she is some sort of religious freak that is subjugated to a fanatical and patriarchl religion. Oh, they think your oppressed? cultish, radical, and fanatical? GOOD.

That is what we SHOULD be going for; it absolutely should provoke everyone from the boomer conservative to the blue haired liberal. Nothing communicates “I’m not my own master” like a dress and head covering, nothing qualifies whatever words proceed from a woman's mouth than feminine attire and a covering on her head, and nothing will remind her of her station more when she gazes in the mirror than an attire that demands the recognition of such. The symbolism itself is powerful, the medium is the message, and appearance of such a woman IS the preaching of transformative Gospel power and the authority of a transcendent moral law from a perfect Law-Giver.

This is where I would ordinarily write a long conclusion, but this article has gone long enough. Its not hard to summarize though:

Ladies, you are a real problem and you can only solve it by obeying your husbands, serving them sexually, bearing them lots of babies, learning from them as your primary teacher, joining new Christian peer-groups with other trad-wives, learning to live in dependency and artificial poverty on purpose, and dressing like a woman who has been brought fully under the patriarchy, especially in public.

That is all. Godsp

← All articles